Skip to main content

7th Week-Progress

I have entered the 7th week since my fatal decision to become a master coder. What progress can I report?

   I finished The Odin Project's Web Development 101 course on Monday and began the third course in curriculum : "Ruby Programming". Although I completed the Codecademy Ruby course and did some other Ruby work a few weeks ago, I felt I needed a review. 

To this end I am redoing the Codecademy course, I completed Chris Pine's book  Learn to Program,  and I reread Chs.2 + 3 of Peter Cooper's Beginning Ruby

Needless to say, the revision was worth it- I have a much clearer understanding of blocks and procs, as well as hashes and arrays.


Concurrent with the Odin Project I am working through the Epicodus curriculum. It is always helpful to have multiple perspectives on a subject.


I have also discovered an intriguing course called FreeCodeCamp. It isn't complete yet, but the aim is to train students to write code for non-profits. Much of the curriculum mirrors The Odin Project, but there a few new resources such as this one for HTML/CSS.


As I mentioned the other day, I have been doing daily Java workouts (using the Coursera Java course). Most of the exercises are maths focused and are useful reviews of Java syntax.

The challenge today was trying to forget how humans do matrix multiplication and explain it to Java without using any fancy inbuilt methods. In the end, I did use the array.length method as it was the easiest way to create the product matrix.

I've also been using a new Pomodoro app to motivate myself and to record my working time. I sometimes forget to turn it on after the alarm has gone, so most days on the graph are underestimates. The app also discards any minutes that aren't part of a complete 25 minute session. So if you've done two 20 minute sessions and were interrupted, there will be no record of that time.

Anyway, here are the first 10 days: 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Einstein's Logic Puzzle (SPOILER ALERT!)

On Monday I began working through a Discrete Math textbook in preparation for some courses I'll be taking in January. There was a beautiful logic problem in Chapter 1, apparently created by Einstein. This is one version of it: Five men with  different nationalities and with different jobs live in  con secutive houses on a street. These houses are painted  dif ferent colors. The men have different pets and have   dif ferent favorite drinks.  Determine who owns a zebra and  whose favorite drink is mineral water (which is one of the  favorite drinks) given these clues:  The Englishman lives  in the red house.  The Spaniard owns a dog.  The Japanese  man is a painter.  The Italian drinks tea.  The Norwegian  lives in the first house on the left.  The green house is  immediately to the right of the white one. The photogra pher  breeds snails.  The diplomat lives in the yellow house. ...

CodeSchool vs Codecademy(or 'How socket inherits event listening methods and implements asynchronicity')

In this review I'm going to focus on the pedagogy that I see evident in some CodeSchool courses and compare them to  Codecademy. By pedagogy, I mean: 'How does CodeSchool teach?' and ' Does it do a good job of teaching?'. I'm going to argue that despite high quality videos, colourful web pages, and often ssspppeeeeeakkkiiiing...rrrreeally...slowly..., CodeSchool's pedagogy is inferior to that of Codecademy. There are many fantastic resources for learning to code on the web, and CodeSchool is one of them. So far I have completed courses in Ruby, Rails, Javascript, HTML/CSS, Jquery and Git on CodeSchool. The courses have all included high quality videos and colourful, interactive exercises- as well as  massive  pdf files of the slides ( the files take more than a minute to load on my machine .) The question is: does the higher production value mean better educational quality? The 'Try' courses on CodeSchool(such as Try Ruby and Try jQuery) are f...

Final-Reference Variables-Constants in Java. What does it all mean?

So far, my programming journey has been easy riding. Everything in computer science I've come across so far seems so logical and (really) obvious after a moment's thought. (n.b. The following will contain mistakes, don't copy and paste this for your Comp.Sci.101 Assignment. If any readers can help clarify my thinking, it would be much appreciated.) Well, except for constants in Java. In Java, you can define a variable and give it a value:   ( e.g. Year current =1932;  creates an variable of type Year and initializes it with the value 1932). Speaking correctly, the variable   current  is NOT equal to 1932. Rather, current is a reference to a location in the computer's memory where the data 1932  is stored. A variable name like current  can be thought of as a listing in a telephone directory: "To find the current year, go to this address in the memory." Variable are so called because their values can change during the running of a program. For ...