Skip to main content

Job as Entry Level Developer

After 4 months of work, sometimes focused, sometimes not, I accepted a job as an Entry Level Ruby on Rails Developer yesterday. This is after starting with zero knowledge on November 1, last year.
Beyond knowing a little about coding (but getting the definitions of  REST and AJAX wrong), what were the reasons for the job offer? 

I think it was the meetup group I started in January that made me stand out from the rest. The motivation for the meetup group was to help me become a better coder and to indulge my teacher instincts. After some initial meetings at the library and my home, an IT hub in town offered to host us. This meant extra advertising and prestige for the group.

After announcing the meetup group at an Agile meetup group for developers, I got some volunteers to give talks. The first volunteer offered a talk on Ruby. As I was comfortable with Ruby I prepared a coding tutorial.  After the tutorial, which was attended by some beginners and some advanced developers, I was invited for a series of interviews at a large software company that works with Ruby on Rails. 

As Joshua Kemp and others have pointed out, networking is a powerful force. Even before this job offer I was receiving LinkedIn offers for jobs way beyond my current ability. Beyond that, being highly motivated also makes a difference. The head of one software company I spoke to recently talked about the CompSci grads he interviews. According to him, many of them have done no coding beyond their coursework- they don't seem to be that passionate about programming. 

I still have a lot of learning to do and a long way to go before I feel competent as a developer, but the path is much clearer now. 

Thanks to the many people whose help I have benefited from over the past four months, (and whose resources I will continue to use as I keep learning). Special thanks to Joshua Kemp for his inspiring blog, Quincy Larson-creator of FreedCodeCamp and Erik Trautman of the fantastic Odin Project. There have been other resources I have used and which I have mentioned in previous posts, all of which have helped me reached my goal.  Thank you.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CodeSchool vs Codecademy(or 'How socket inherits event listening methods and implements asynchronicity')

In this review I'm going to focus on the pedagogy that I see evident in some CodeSchool courses and compare them to  Codecademy. By pedagogy, I mean: 'How does CodeSchool teach?' and ' Does it do a good job of teaching?'. I'm going to argue that despite high quality videos, colourful web pages, and often ssspppeeeeeakkkiiiing...rrrreeally...slowly..., CodeSchool's pedagogy is inferior to that of Codecademy. There are many fantastic resources for learning to code on the web, and CodeSchool is one of them. So far I have completed courses in Ruby, Rails, Javascript, HTML/CSS, Jquery and Git on CodeSchool. The courses have all included high quality videos and colourful, interactive exercises- as well as  massive  pdf files of the slides ( the files take more than a minute to load on my machine .) The question is: does the higher production value mean better educational quality? The 'Try' courses on CodeSchool(such as Try Ruby and Try jQuery) are f...
Post a Comment
Read more

Algorithm Analysis - 1

Currently, I'm learning to perform algorithm analysis using Big-O notation. In one resource I found the following problem: You just dropped a box of glass toys and  n  toys in the box broke in half. You'd like to match the halves of the toys so that you could glue them together, but the only way to tell whether two halves belonged to one toy is to physically pick up the two pieces and try to fit them together. Express how long this matching process will take in terms of  n . The answer given is n^2 (n squared) with the following explanation:  You have to compare every piece with every other piece. If you have 1 toy and it breaks in half, you have 1 comparison to make. If you have 2 toys and they both break in half there are 4 pieces and you have to do 6 comparisons. If you have 3 toys, there are 6 pieces and you have to do 15 comparisons. If you have  N/2  toys, you have  N  pieces and you have to do N-1 + N-2 + N-3 + ... + 1 =(N)(N-1)/2...
Post a Comment
Read more

Venturing into Number Theory

In attempt to solve a maths problem with Ruby, I discovered the benefits of going beyond simple arithmetic. Perhaps surprisingly, many seemingly complex mathematical problems can be solved using basic arithmetic and raw computing power. Most of the time this doesn't pose a problem. However, as the values involved grow larger, the demands on the computer's memory reaches a critical point beyond which you risk crashing your computer.  The problem I was trying to solve was the following:    What is the smallest positive number that is evenly divisible  by all of the numbers from 1 to 20? After causing my computer to hang for several minutes, I realized I had to rewrite the program I was working on. The program had to take shortcuts, so that instead of testing every single value between 1 and 1 million, it only tested likely values. With the help of my lovely wife (a Maths teacher) I rewrote the program using prime numbers.   class SmallestProduct requ...
Post a Comment
Read more