Skip to main content

Week 4 start

It has been three weeks-what have I learned?

       Sugata Mitra's credo is true- at least when it comes to computer programming. Anyone can learn programming online: there is a plethora of resources. Additionally, programming offers instant feedback-it's unlikely you will 'break' your computer and your program either works or it doesn't.
       Since last week I have discovered the Odin Project, a free online curriculum for web development. (Check out this post for some advice on following the Odin Project.) So far, it has been fantastic; I have a real sense of progress and I am accomplishing something. I am halfway through designing the Google Search page (it's not as easy as it sounds).
   
      Here's an update on the courses I'm working through:

      • Saylor Academy-CS102: Not as well resourced as the first course. I'm having trouble with the C++ compiler, some of the Unit 1 resources are a little opaque, but otherwise I still feel confident about investing my time with Saylor Academy. I've moved on to Unit 2-I'm reading through Introduction to Programming using Java, an excellent, free book.
      • I'm also working through the Harvard course CS50x. If you've already done CS101 from the Saylor Academy (which I recommend), the first couple of weeks will be straightforward. The Java you have learned will be more than adequate to complete the Week0 and 1 problem sets.
      • R-Programming is not a well designed course, but I plan to finish it anyway. I would recommend learning Java, Python or C# on Coursera or CodeAcademy for the programming aspect and Foundations of Data Analysis on edX to learn some R.
      • Also, I've completed Weeks 3 of Inititiation a la programmation en Java, Computer Science 101(Stanford)  and Introduction to Logic. I discovered the Khan Academy Math courses which are well designed and learn from your interaction with them.
Am I closer to securing a job? Not at all- but I've learned a lot and I've finished each day with a sense of accomplishment.


       

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Einstein's Logic Puzzle (SPOILER ALERT!)

On Monday I began working through a Discrete Math textbook in preparation for some courses I'll be taking in January. There was a beautiful logic problem in Chapter 1, apparently created by Einstein. This is one version of it: Five men with  different nationalities and with different jobs live in  con secutive houses on a street. These houses are painted  dif ferent colors. The men have different pets and have   dif ferent favorite drinks.  Determine who owns a zebra and  whose favorite drink is mineral water (which is one of the  favorite drinks) given these clues:  The Englishman lives  in the red house.  The Spaniard owns a dog.  The Japanese  man is a painter.  The Italian drinks tea.  The Norwegian  lives in the first house on the left.  The green house is  immediately to the right of the white one. The photogra pher  breeds snails.  The diplomat lives in the yellow house. ...

CodeSchool vs Codecademy(or 'How socket inherits event listening methods and implements asynchronicity')

In this review I'm going to focus on the pedagogy that I see evident in some CodeSchool courses and compare them to  Codecademy. By pedagogy, I mean: 'How does CodeSchool teach?' and ' Does it do a good job of teaching?'. I'm going to argue that despite high quality videos, colourful web pages, and often ssspppeeeeeakkkiiiing...rrrreeally...slowly..., CodeSchool's pedagogy is inferior to that of Codecademy. There are many fantastic resources for learning to code on the web, and CodeSchool is one of them. So far I have completed courses in Ruby, Rails, Javascript, HTML/CSS, Jquery and Git on CodeSchool. The courses have all included high quality videos and colourful, interactive exercises- as well as  massive  pdf files of the slides ( the files take more than a minute to load on my machine .) The question is: does the higher production value mean better educational quality? The 'Try' courses on CodeSchool(such as Try Ruby and Try jQuery) are f...

Final-Reference Variables-Constants in Java. What does it all mean?

So far, my programming journey has been easy riding. Everything in computer science I've come across so far seems so logical and (really) obvious after a moment's thought. (n.b. The following will contain mistakes, don't copy and paste this for your Comp.Sci.101 Assignment. If any readers can help clarify my thinking, it would be much appreciated.) Well, except for constants in Java. In Java, you can define a variable and give it a value:   ( e.g. Year current =1932;  creates an variable of type Year and initializes it with the value 1932). Speaking correctly, the variable   current  is NOT equal to 1932. Rather, current is a reference to a location in the computer's memory where the data 1932  is stored. A variable name like current  can be thought of as a listing in a telephone directory: "To find the current year, go to this address in the memory." Variable are so called because their values can change during the running of a program. For ...